Below is a link for a public childbirth education resource page.
https://www.scoop.it/t/childbirth-education-by-ammie-tremblay
The goal that I have is to create a resources page for parents to access and get information that relates to childbirth education.
I really want to create a space that can house five minute videos that I create that relate to childbirth education.
As I did my research this week I was looking for the ideas to find a place that gave me more then what I can do, this of course is =going to cost money, becasue the free site does not cover all that I need, but if I pay for it I believe I can create a resource for new mom”s and families.
This Scoop It!! is not the idea of what I really want at this point, but I like the idea that I can group these resources and add and update as I need.
I used my rubric to judge the Scoop IT! site.
I placed the bolded on the met items. I feel that with a little more time, I can probably use this tool very easily. I just wonder how I can get my audience to my Scoop IT!! site?
NS 644 Tremblay: Technology Assessment Rubric Template.
| Exceeds Expectations | Meets Expectations | Unacceptable | |
| Help/
Support
|
Help section is detailed; includes both video and textual content; clear indication of where and how to find help; seamless experience for user; phone or chat support available. | Provides a help section with information related to all classroom uses; easy to find and use. | Help section not provided; difficult to impossible to find; lacks content relevant to classroom use. |
| Student –Centered Learning focuses digital resource/Tool
|
The resources effectively apply technology to improve learning outcomes and help students develop the skills for college and career readiness.
|
The resource is able to navigate the learner to develop skills for college and career readiness | The resource can be navigated with active learning component to the site. |
| Function of the Tool/digital resource
|
Clearly explained how the tools work using a large range of action verbs and technical words | Clearly explained how the tools work using action verbs and technical words | Explained how the tools work using some action verbs and technical words |
| Design of Tool/Digital resource
|
Clearly identified and explained in detail, two problems with the tools | Clearly identified and explained two problems with the tools | Identified and explained two problems with the tools |
| Content of Tool/Digital resource
|
Reflects essential information; is logically arranged; concepts succinctly presented; no misspellings or grammatical errors | Reflects most of the essential information; is generally logically arranged; concepts presented without too many excess words; fewer than three misspellings or grammatical errors. | Contains extraneous information; is not logically arranged; contains numerous spelling and grammatical errors. |
| Text of Tool and Digital Resource
|
Easy to read/ appropriately sized; no more than three different fonts; amount of text is appropriate for intended audience; boldface used for emphasis. | Most text is easy to read; uses no more than four different fonts; amount of text generally fits intended audience. | Font too small to read easily; more than four different fonts used; text amount is excessive for intended audience. |
| Accessibility or Tool and Digital resource
|
The resource is accessible to all types of students. It accommodates those with learning and/or physical disabilities.
|
The resource is accessible to most types of students. It partially accommodates those with learning and/or physical disabilities
|
The resource is not accessible to all types of students. It does not accommodate for those with learning and/or physical disabilities.
|
| Resources used in the Tool /digital recourses are Evidence based and less then 5 years old.
|
Resource page:
Resources less then 5 years old Evidence Based resources used Resources supported in peer review practice and organizations |
Resources:
Most resources used less then 5 years. Resources are peer reviewed |
Resources:
Difficulty to find, None present Non-evidence based practice resources non-peer reviewed resources. |
| Technical Soundness
|
The resource is always reliable. It is easy to use and/or understand | The resource is reliable some of the time. It is slightly difficult to use and/or understand. | The resource is not reliable. It is difficult to use and/ or understand.
|
| Design and appeal of the tool/digital resource
|
Clean design; high visual appeal; four or fewer symbol shapes; fits page without a lot of scrolling; color used effectively for emphasis. | Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions; diagram has visual appeal; four or fewer symbol shapes; fits page well; uses color effectively most of time. | Cluttered design; low in visual appeal; requires a lot of scrolling to view entire diagram; choice of colors lacks visual appeal and impedes comprehension. |
Tremblay's Tool Journey 
Hi Ammie,
I really liked your use of Scoop It!! Talk about a wonderful curation, like one stop shopping for someone planning pregnancy, during pregnancy, and following pregnancy. Those who visit your site will find an abundance of credible information that you have pre-screened with your professional knowledge. You used this assignment to design a purposeful curation that I look forward to following as our professional interests overlap.
Jan
LikeLike